Add End Um

[Posted on 12-15-11]
The November Archives are apparently full. Not to pun on it, not to mention anachronism*.
Here are the missing links.
11-1-11 SIX SIGMA
11-1-11 Hyper Sorting
(scroll over or click on)
11-2-11
11-3-11
11-6-11
11-7-11
11-9-11
11-10-11
11-10-11
just in case

*bottom links should be link to most recent post

Pay Dirt / Tax Mud

Rachel Maddow rakes over Senator Kyl for his not intending to make "factual statements" shovel.*
He never actually said X, but effectively and economically, Y is the same thing. Except when it is for the 99%. Tax cuts for the 1% do not need to be paid for. Also not extending the Bush tax cuts, is a tax increase. But tax cuts for the 99%, those need to be paid for, and not extending them are not a tax increase.

I think the slogan "NO NEW TAXES" is very Democratic, give us the old taxes. And a new Texas might not hurt.



*12-1-11 bold and link added: X-mass L[!] & Google** of the day***.
** if capitalized, I give credit where due, if not, then it is like clean-X, or ex-finity? And there is always the upper-L search box.
***LSM Clinton[/](Lewinsky)Scandal MoveOn (Truly[*iv] Never Never Land)
*iv: see 3 minutes in till you google, Republicans say raise taxes(po lls ).
[* Follow-up]

[X= "I have never said that all tax cuts always pay for themselves."
Y= "You should never have to off-set the cost of a deliberate decision to reduce tax rates on Americans..."
Senator Kyl is not lying about what he has never said, literally, but see chart, and how tax cuts pay for themselves. But there is a two fold problem here. One, following my words in the equation. Two, following the chart. But it seems to me that actually, in the Permanent Tax Cuts category, it would be even harder to say. But it does seem to show a relative benefit to old tax rates mixed with Obama tax rates, and flip-flopping the Republican tax policy, as we have virtual mud from the trickle-down. And we even have pun with the bank and the cave.]

XIV: allegory of the cave (a,b,c,d,e)
or singular(a,b, c ,d,e,f,g,h,i,j)

[hint C.3: MoveOn / GPS]
[Last UL Search (a,b,c,d)]
Speaking of mud. RM Glitch host.

4A

or other meanderings of 4M.

Note anachronism of bottom link. Posted today, but located 11-1-11.
Bottom link there should reflect its previous post.

November archives are beyond capacity, hence the supplement and timing issues.*

*and why I posted it 11-11-11[!] Not to Un-Satire.

I a,b,c
II a,b,c,d,e,f,g,
III
IV [**]
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
XIII
XIV a,b,c,d
XV a, b

Scroll-over is a convenient tool, hope yours works. If you know how to turn it on or off, let me know, in comments. I lost it for a time and mysteriously it returned. But the point of my Roman numerals is to record what should be at some of the embedded links, just in case they are susceptible to change***.

[**] Platonics (Form,Forum,4M)
*** other than typos updated posts.

Mess Age Monger

Reading between the lines.
See Draft,(now that is a tangent),
but I will skip the sign over cosign.
Or See Cant [!]
[Follow-up.]

Two Points Determine a Line.

Foot:Notes (!0

[Now I will parse the irony. The two points are Occupy Wall Street and the National Defense Appropriations Act. (Rebranding a SALT or SLAT**) Actually only one of these last links was the trigger for this line of thought. My point is about the lines as we make them. We are an exceptional country that is at risk of being more like those in the past. Congress is responsible for drawing the lines, and the judiciary and executive are responsible for interpreting and navigating them. Sorry there is no punch line, but that is the dilemma. Re-leads* and typos.

* my original intent was our foundation or 4mat not type ohs.
[The people must be heard, not a herd, let alone hurd.(ouch) It is an uphill job.]

Un-Seg-Way.
[** Strategic Argument Limitations Treaty or Strategic Lines Assault Tactics. Are you with M or again M? V4 VOTE! That is the spell/check of sorts.]

[Speaking of witch or spell checking...two notes of caution. I do not mean to make light of violence, food products or Occupy Wall Street. Or the Heck do I? But is there a line for satire or freedom?(Comity Central in mind.) And R we exceptional or the exception? And you rule!***

*** not original two notes of caution
[Not to mention: On the other hand, save the POST OFFICE and consider upgrading our constitutional links to include the internet. The internet is a post road. And congress legislates regarding commerce.]

[Follow up / un-M-beds]

[Speaking of Timing: Norman Goldman and Sasha. Redo taxes from the ground up. I did not catch enough to know if it was the same Sasha, but it is interesting that I had run across the connection, in follow-up. Not to mention Bill Maher on the question of taxes and class war and who is following [up] or being lead. And how prophetic in my lede and how I followed up in bold. Norman feels it is a misread of sorts. BTW: it is S. 1867 that has s. 1031 & 1032 respecting Amendment 1107.]

Occupy Wall Street has won.

I just can't remember what the sign was, or the source. The crack involves some Republican or other mess age monger, breaking with the no taxes position. If I recall, I will source it here *. Oh yeah, it might have been the New Hampshire Union Leader endorsement of Newt Gingrich because he is not Mitt, who is the 1%.

* Still not primary source [thanks to Rachel Maddow: not the source, just the reminder, See Bob Herbert.]

[11-28-11 MoveOn [?]
Looking Up?
Tax Buts.
Mess Age Monger[]
Alter Net?]

When did liberals get so unreasonable?

Mike Check... and
moore [!]

Mean*** while Week ends with Alex Witt: Fact or fiction of taxes*.

*original link not located
[11-27-11** related belated links]
** Durbin/Kyle video(2:50-plus) Laffer curve a laffer, speaking of laffer? [Herd v. heard?]
***late insert

[Are we there yet?

Post-Turkey Day

RSN[11-25-11][12-1-11 Punchline? Spoiler Alert, do not click on Punchline, before reading full post.]
Krugman, connecting the dots,
Will Durst,
Relative Exceptionalism

Speaking of good dialogue and jokers and will. I met Will Durst at a Democratic function probably in 2004. I managed to catch him at a disadvantage, not intentionally but anything to get a word in. His hands were full or reaching for something in his pockets. Well maybe it was an advantage )IF[*]( you wanted to be prepared for a spit take, as he had an empty coffee cup in his mouth. So I tried out a joke that had come to me. "If corporations are people, where does the death penalty fit in?" So, he was polite or inconvenienced enough to laugh, if I recall correctly, with the cup still in his mouth.

Where do we go from here, the Turkey table? Well... have a good one[!]?

Post Game:
Stieglitz and Krugman new paradigm or paramorphology. Lexical creativity, texts and contexts.

Speaking of Turkeys or even the country[!] {t}=tangent slash criss cross or Relative Exceptionalism, or satire and witch[!]came first, the satire or the jihad? Thanks to Joseph Campbell...

Reader Supported News: The Sharia Turkey
The American Thinker: Happy Halal Thanksgiving
Rob McKenna
Literally in that order. The McKenna ad was found in the American Thinker link, which was in the RSN link, which was from TPMMuckraker. My original intent was to track the satire. Which came first the halal or the peta? Well more correctly in who was sat iring whom? I mean is this really along the lines of the war on Xmas? The FOX in the hen(turkey) house? I mean sat ire[!] at the table! No not IRE but pass the trip to fane.

Actually, I am trying to find something in common*. But I must check the history of halal** and the people for the ethical treatment of animals. The only point in common may be the freedom to choose, another brand, and that may be sharia. Am I carving the irony or just stuffing the turkey?

*Geller and PETA?
** Sharia and hunters: healthy treatment of food
[*] typo original is to IF.

Relative Exceptionalism

American Exceptionalism, was coined by a Frenchman.

American exceptionalism refers to the theory that the United States is qualitatively different from other countries. In this view, America's exceptionalism stems from its emergence from a revolution, becoming "the first new nation,"[1] and developing a uniquely American ideology, based on liberty, egalitarianism, individualism, populism and laissez-faire. This observation can be traced to Alexis de Tocqueville, the first writer to describe the United States as "exceptional" in 1831 and 1840.[2] Historian Gordon Wood has argued, "Our beliefs in liberty, equality, constitutionalism, and the well-being of ordinary people came out of the Revolutionary era. So too did our idea that we Americans are a special people with a special destiny to lead the world toward liberty and democracy."[3]

Well, not literally. It was actually first used by Joseph Stalin.

The specific term "American exceptionalism" was first used in 1929 by Soviet leader Joseph Stalin chastising members of the American Communist Party for believing that America was independent of the Marxist laws of history "thanks to its natural resources, industrial capacity, and absence of rigid class distinctions."[4]

Speaking of original intent*:

Although the term does not necessarily imply superiority, many neoconservative and American conservative writers have promoted its use in that sense.[1][5] To them, the United States is like the biblical "shining city on a hill," and exempt from historical forces that have affected other countries.[6]

Since the 1960s "postnationalist" scholars on the left have rejected American exceptionalism, arguing that the United States had not broken from European history, and has retained class inequities, imperialism and war. Furthermore, they saw every nation as subscribing to some form of exceptionalism.[7]

But here is the trigger** for my lede. See *** there:

Which communities use lethal force for crowd control? Anyone with health concerns should be careful where they press their 1st amendment rights.

*mine was in the lede(pre-wiki)
[But here are more links]
** not to suggest more than civil disobedience(but Relative in the lede)

[Meanwhile, there also may be room for a balanced budget amendment to the constitution. But that is problematic, in that I suggest a choice. Or rather politics might make it. The idea is not that dangerous, but putting any parameters on it, is what would make it a deal breaker. If it could be the GOTV for 2012, it might make for good dialogue for the Republic.

Follow-up: Tragedy or not[! Still Life with Romney.]

Close enough...

for government work?
Actually there is a more honorable history to that cliche.

Even preemption* on the flip-flop?

Thanks** to Politics Nation.

*not exactly i.e. four mat draft ***

** yet to insert current link...here or Texas Walker? [follow up]

***11-22-11

True Footnote

[Finally posted 11-29-11]
the law
(a,b,c,d,e,f,g, h,i, j, oops real j, k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t)
the military
(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o)

to note that these are the search finds at the time I embedded them.

[Timing is an issue.** Obviously I am inserting them after the fact. Which at some point became the bottom link. i.e. at some point in my format, the link at the bottom became the just prior post. Having two in draft, not yet posted, I must note that after I post this, the above contents links, a-n, and a-o will evolve*.]

Pop = (a,b,c,d,slash e,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l, m)note the slash e, was accidentally prophetic*, as I inserted them a thru m as originally searched and alphabetized.

* came from the law

[**] obviously ** follows * (but there are two *) The frame pop involves his story. C-Lakoff, not sorted or parsed***.

*** a,b,c,d,e
[My original intent was not to go Lakoff, nor mess with the message. Well, not exactly.]

Bane and Company

"If we keep talking about the economy we will lose."
A more anachronistically correct quote was never said.
The sentence and yes I mean (bane and Company, Inc.)

It was actually said by Presidential candidate John McCain, about their campaign, and is exactly what will doom any Republican campaign. The Democrats will want to keep talking about the economy, as well as what the solutions are.

[My apologies*** for losing which major network noted* the Romney "quote"/ad. But later...]

* a search engine found these two links

[On another front: civil disobedience and** the blue line***.]

** (correction)/update
*** actually I have two...this is a tragedy that if true, begs the question. Which communities use lethal force for crowd control? Anyone with health concerns should be careful where they press their 1st amendment rights. Will there be accountability? Is it a federal concern, or based on community standards, or walking like an Egyptian. I am not advising the same pathology, but there is breaking news on that front.
*** third dimes a charm Who walks the line?

[Note the timing & *** which are recyled, and problematic: The asterisks are separated by my tangents and breaking news. There are two uses of the triple asterisks within the text, as well in footnote. This is an unhint of sorts. I wish I could bold a path.]
[The tragedy of the third footnote*** allows segue "On another front...": the line the law and military walk,(see drafts) for the people, and what makes us exceptional.]
[Now three in draft, including True Footnote.]

Reading between the lines...

without reading the lines. Not to just pun, but will the Super Committe fail?

Maybe it is already in the cards. Not that I have marked any C A R D. Bush tax cuts must expire. That is already in the cards. Using it as a sticking point is a joker. The president has been dealt from the bottom of the deck. Congress is the house, are we the vigorish? But actually my idea is that we use the Republican rhetoric. They have claimed he has gotten everything he asked for, and have blaimed him for not using the Simpson-Bowles suggestions. In actuality, they did not come up with a concensus, and the president put it all on the table. So the Super Committe does not have to fail, it just needs to report a non-consensus, and Congress can do their usual thing, and they can risk failure, which might be still better*. Ideally there will be up or down votes on parts of it whether they reach consensus or not. Then it will be the peoples turn to deal, at election time. It that is bringing in politics, that is what brings in the people. And that "my friends", is the name of the game, not to channel McCain.

* embedded "kick the can" misplaced

A Revolution?

[Finally posted 11-29-11]
See "A wonder" (update) 11-22-11 And The Daily Show CTRL f cheese. Non Exclusive Maddow search later.

Original intent. Yogurt? No, Romney. No comma. Intestinal fortitude? Or bacterial tubes.
[Steele Matthews? kiss up ? Draft three? True Footnote. Punderous Pondering? Or bubble up?]
{Breaking a leg or trickle up? Jonathan Chaite. A romance with Obama? But what is relative? Salon pushes and the GOP? Thrilled by table. Another article in revolution.}
{This post is very anachronistic, not published yet. The links are but not "A Revolution". Speaking of tragedies, I forgot that today is the 48th observance of the assasination of President Kennedy.

A wonder...

[Finally posted 11-29-11]
Be careful what you wish for. Actually I was just wondering if I alway have the best of intentions. I believe I do. Actually(and the word literally may be the key *) I am usually wondering, and not usually about wishes or intentions. What I was concerned about is not being taken correctly. And that is dangersous with satire, not to mention other's ways with words. I wonder if that is what M(in)M had in mind when he punned his nom de plume.

* some(or sum) might say trigger

I
II

III

IV
V
V

11-22-11
SEGUE OWS: True Footnote now makes three. Missing link(bottom) noted, no pun on evolution. But it is "A wonder..." and Revolution 11-21-11 that suff ice? Draft?(a,b,c,d, e,f,g,h,i,j, k,l,m,n,p,o,q,r, s,t,u) No u v, but up to you. (meta yogurt)

It is hard to say Herman means anything literally.

Or actually?

He did not say "I'm a leader not a reader",
nor did the Schwarzenegger.
It is about lede'er ship[!]

[11-21-11: As "A Wonder..." is held in draft, I am processing a Revolution. Speaking of Calm Cast, I didn't mean to forcast.]
[As for weather[!], recent Republican interference in presidential foreign policy* is dangerous** stuff, and further muddles the mess age and message. I don't know if anyone can ever be a Nixon to China after this administration, or a Cain to business.]

* recent event references not noted in link
** a,b
[note: [!] = (sic)or sarcasm/irony Also "A Wonder..." under construction.]
[Segue: good for?(sic?) NOT!]
[Just to be clear*** I am not opposed to six sigma or cuts, but there is a food chain, or some hierarchy which is bubble up. Incidentally, it is a lot like the cycle of life and climate change. The segue or root here is the cost effectiveness, not trickle down. Money is not the root of all evil, nor is any tool or process, necessarily.]

*** the NOT! is not fully read yet(NFRY)
[Speaking of not read yet, the point is in the lede, or prelede. It is easier to debunk, than bunker up. MORNING MESSAGE: America's Affluent and the New Bunker Down, literally(!?)]

Being a Blank "is Hard Work".

Meaning found in file folder:
Being a Heretic is Hard Work.
Or maybe it is the difference between being and getting 'er done.

[OWS verse the 1%?]
[Getting 'er* done?]


*apologies to*** whom[!]?

[Speaking** of Labels...U.N? Not to mention fair and balanced.]

** a, b, c, d (thin blue line ?) Or Re:U.N.

*** LOL: Laughter Occupy Lawyers (not to make light, but...)

[Note Labels U.N.(Unhate, Nuance), G'Ribble(or D'Ribble?)]
[Bottom line? See commenT and lede, and found'ers: Being a Blank "is Hard Work".]
[Super Stick: Debt Deal or Leverage: One thing about the Debt Ceiling deal and the Super Committee is that its failure is a not really that crucial. If it gets something done, the next congress can undo it. If it doesn't get anything done, the next congress will handle the cuts. Heck, I am not even certain it would be binding. Either way the next election will be telling. But anything balanced from the committee will not only be unlikely, but will not balance the history of Republican obstructionism since Obama game into office, nor balance the Republican debt.(See saw)]

CommenT

Tangent from CampBell*.

T: not just tangent but tetrakys? Transcendence, Track, Takeover**, Teach. F o r P? For what?

* Bell disambig.(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h.)

** it is not about levels but culture over clash
[anachonistic post]

Recent Reichert Ad

Sound* Politics?
Sound Journalism? I mean...

* puppet chamber or tent?
(anachronistic post)
*a,b,c,d
(chamber)/(foreign legion)

It's Not Rocket Science...

or Nuclear Engineering.

I(from desktop/ignition)(a,b)
II(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j)
III(a,b,c)
IV(a,b)
V(a,b,c,d)
(Labels-ROR-NOT[!])
[State of Thought: Curve or Nuance Thing]

But I don't kNOw what it is[!]*

*(a,b)

[Not Exactly: the puzzle guy**]

** VI [?](a,b,c,d,e,f,g)

*** C puzzle(w/o * 's)
(See lost asterisk)
[Update LabeLs.]
[Just in re:Bloomberg.]

The L-Words and Curve Balls.

Martin Bashir has Barnie Frank on, who mentions the two L-words apply. Bashir even borrowed and twisted my line. My first reaction was, then there is the L-curve, also two-fold. Ed Schultz rubs it in and Rachel Maddow points out the Republican field is being graded on a curve. There is another intersection with my early reaction. Newt Gingrich was working the Jack Abramoff angle on Freddie Mac. Now we know why he has been at it* for 53 years, or beaten in 53 years?
* I think that is the original interpretation: that it was his trip to France at age 15, maybe he found his Gaul. (not to be facitious, it is admirable that he may have found interest in history at age 15. Incidentally the same age I was politically activated by the likes of Plato and R. Buckminster Fuller. Only the latter actually being a contemporary presence, at the first Earth Day.)
(Speaking** of Curve Balls)

** Hagen Daz of the hour? Not even Queen for a day.

Where everyone needs to read...

local that is, the Seattle Post Intelligencer and Joel Connelly**.
But* not so fast.

* related facebook comments: Since the original poster had little context, I will only post my replies here.
< Here is to Herman Cain: "Stupid people are ruining America." Then he attracks them like a moth to a flame. The irony is that corporate persons already suffer from a sort of cultural innoculation. Or is it "the hash they have made" or "in...difference" to reality". OWS, may not only be a breeding ground for what might "thin out the herd", but of "super" bugs that may just be the new yogurt or intenstinal fortitude that bugs king context. Flavor this economically pathological.>
< ‎@K.O. Kudos for replying in mixed metaphor. Nice shuffle of the birds and the bees, you may have picked up on the "social Darwinism". But I am not sure we agree who the dealer is, or rather who counts, and who are the cards. Let alone who lives on borrowed money.>
< ‎@K.O. BTW: I do believe you missed a "dis" or something, as V.H. pointed out. As in "How dare you dis Scott..." etc. And you are correct that Scott was neutral in the original posting, but if "context is king" then M.J. was not the royal pain. The original was a mere "'reporting", but that does not mean it was not leaning on some con text, as reactions have shown.>

Not so G(AB)W. C-fields.
[anachrogate? And more. Also KUOW with Mayor McGinn.]

** Original intent: local ledership and rail issues(see *). Bit*** of a stretch? Not really.
*** Rachel Maddow: debunktion junction. That as for a junction: Europe is not U.S when it comes to austerity, infrastructure or other investments.

[11-15-11: OWS/Reporting. Free Speech and Porta Pottys.]

[MSNBC: Rachel MadDow [!][and Aye of Newt?]
[Articulate.

It is about time...

[Actually drafted and posted 11-29-11]
and I don't mean the fourth dimention, although typos do play on the path of the mess age monger. But it is about the anachronism of 3 draft pieces, originally titled: "A Wonder...", "A Revolution?", and "True Footnote". Speaking of Rachel Maddow it is about the sequence that must be noted, */ Kyl taxes Op Ed & Tax Butts...

But to drop the other shoe.

*/ segue/rough draft...or other draft or quartering.

To all those who served...

a venerable Veteran's Day!

Every American should be grateful for your service in protecting America and its freedoms. Every one of those freedoms should be honored[*] and fought for by every American or it would be just another country.

[Update Labels]
[Goedel and Goethe, Stephanie Miller and Mike Molloy, Ying and Yang? The Platonic Cultural Model, Tyranny/Anarchy dynamics. It's more than Math or Geometry.]
[*] 11-12-11 Platitudes Re:/v. Platonics(SEGUE TWO): With Romney in mind, nonetheless. (More Over)

Killer Ad from Killer Group

Crossroads GPS employs Killer Rhetoric.

Here is the missing link. Applying even a modicum of similarity one can more reliably say that indeed, Crossroads GPS are taking people down. Not that this is "fair and balanced" rhetoric, nor Lemony* Snicket.

* rats leaving us die looted

Not to make light...

but actually that is the point. To shine a light on things.

While there is a far cry from the Penn State tragedy and the "agreement" that Herman Cain is dancing around, there does seem to be the thread of "market forces".

I should note, that like Cain, in some respects I blame the media. But we must not shoot the messenger. Nor necessarily "blame yourselves" for not having all the horrific D-tales. i.e. I don't think the severity of the details came to light immediately. Even though events have occurred over a broader spectrum of time [!]
Oops ? That's Right. That's the ticket[!]
[Who wants their MTV?]
[Back to a revisiting of the Star Chamber, Randi Rhodes is up there with her always insightful and often inciteful analysis of the Republicans as well as Obamanomics. Lawrence O'Donnell is the MSNBC/congressional version. Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz are two candidates I endorsed for their positions at MSNBC. And Norman Goldman is like the most legal and often infuriating, point of light.]